| Regular City Commission Meeting | Mayor Gray presiding |
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 PM
ROLL CALL: City Commissioners present: Randy Gray, Sandy Hinz, Diane Jovick-Kuntz, and John Rosenbaum. Commissioner Beecher was excused. Also present were the Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, Directors of Park and Recreation, Community Development, Library, State Fair, Fire Chief, Police Chief, Acting Directors of Planning and Public Works and the City Clerk.
MOMENT OF SILENCE in remembrance of those who lost their lives in the recent terrorist bombings of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
PUBLIC HEARINGS |
|||||||||||||||
| Res. 9187, Cost Recovery GF Townsite B508 L1. Adopted. | 1.
RESOLUTION 9187, COST RECOVERY, GF TOWNSITE, B508, L1.
Staff Report 1 ] [ Res. 9187 ]
The owner of property, Jeramy Michael Showers, at 500 9 Avenue South, was issued a notice of hearing before the City Commission. The hearing was to show cause why the owner of the property should not be liable for the costs incurred in razing the structure known as 500 9Avenue South. The following expenses were incurred:
On April 23, 2001, Mr. Showers was given 30 days to cleanup the property at 500 9 Avenue South. Mr. Showers did not comply and Staff received bids for the cleanup work. The low bid was awarded to Austin-Reid Demolition, Inc., who completed the work on August 20, 2001. Mayor Gray declared the public hearing open. No one appeared to speak in opposition to Resolution 9187. Morgan Wolf, 1115 8th Avenue North, spoke in support. There being no one further to address the Commission, Mayor Gray closed the public hearing. Commissioner Jovick-Kuntz moved, seconded by Commissioner Rosenbaum, that the City Commission adopt Resolution 9187.
Motion carried 4-0.
|
||||||||||||||
OLD BUSINESS |
|||||||||||||||
NEW BUSINESS |
|||||||||||||||
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS |
|||||||||||||||
| Res. 9190, Create Four Seasons Arena Board. Adopted. | 2.
RESOLUTION 9190, CREATE THE FOUR SEASONS ARENA BOARD.
Staff Report 2 ] [ Res. 9190 ]
A facilitated session was held on May 30, 2001; Ginny Tribe of Missoula, Montana, was the facilitator. The purpose of the session was to bring together the diverse groups of users of the Four Seasons Arena and community representatives to consider and recommend how the City could better serve the diverse needs of the community with the Four Seasons Arena. Establishing an arena board for the Four Seasons Arena was a recommendation made by the participants of the facilitated session. The purpose of the Four Seasons Arena Board is to provide recommendations to the Manager and Fair Board in oversight of the Four Seasons Arena. It is anticipated that the Board will: 1) recommend policies, procedures, and rates; 2) review revenues and expenses of the facility in order to provide a facility for the community that meets the greatest possible need and is managed and maintained as a community asset; 3) review and recommend solutions to conflicts resulting from competing uses; and 4) will actively participate in fund raising for capital equipment needed for the facility. Commissioner Rosenbaum moved, seconded by Commissioners Hinz and Jovick-Kuntz, that the City Commission adopt Resolution 9190. Morgan Wolf, 1115 8th Avenue North, encouraged the creation of this board and suggested that the American's Hockey Team have a representative on the Board. State Fair Manager Patty Gumenberg stated that the group requesting the creation of this Board recommended that ice users have one representative on the Board. Commission Hinz asked if the Board would have budgetary control over the Four Seasons. Assistant City Manager Cheryl Patton stated they would not.
There being no further discussion, Mayor Gray called for the vote. Motion carried 4-0.
|
||||||||||||||
| Res. 9188, Vacate a portion of Gallatin (Jaycee) Park. Adopted. | 3.
RESOLUTION 9188, VACATE A PORTION OF PARKLAND IN GALLATIN PARK COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS JAYCEE PARK.
Staff Report 3 ] [ Res. 9188 ]
The southern edge of park land know as Gallatin Park in North Riverview Terrace Section 2 and Park in North Riverview Terrace Addition, Section 3, Part 1 (both Parks are also known as Jaycee Park) historically have been used as a paved street (23 Avenue NE) for the purpose of public access to the park land and the abutting private property to the south. In order to provide for proper legal public access along 23 Avenue NE between Division Road and 4 Street NE, it was necessary to vacate the southern sixty feet of both Parks and dedicate that land as street right-of-way. The need to accomplish this change of land designation became more important with further development in the Twilite Theater Tracts. Resolution 9188 vacates the southern 60 feet of the existing park land known as Jaycee Park and a concurrent amended plat would allow this land to be dedicated as public right-of-way. The public right-of-way designation will allow 23 Avenue NE to be accepted as a public street, provide a utility right-of-way, and qualify that section of 23Avenue NE for gas tax funding. The Park Board endorsed the proposal to vacate this park land and rededicate it as street right-of-way at the July 9, 2001, Park Board Meeting. Commissioner Hinz moved, seconded by Commissioner Jovick-Kuntz, that the City Commission adopt Resolution 9188.
Motion carried 4-0.
|
||||||||||||||
| Res. 9191, Intent to Annex a portion of Lot 18, Block 2, GF 15 Add. Adopted. | 4.
RESOLUTION 9191, INTENT TO ANNEX A PORTION OF LOT 18, BLOCK 2, GF 15TH ADDITION.
Resolution 9191 sets a public hearing for October 16, 2001, to consider the annexation of the southerly portion of Lot 18, Block 2, GF 15th Addition, a vacant parcel located at the northwest corner of the intersection of 9 Street South and 17 Avenue South. Harold Poulsen submitted applications regarding the following:
The subject vacant parcel to be annexed is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of 9 Street South and 17 Avenue South. The applicant intends to construct a medical clinic on the site involving a two floor building totaling 15,000 square feet. The Planning Board conducted a public hearing on the annexation on July 24, 2001. No proponents or opponents spoke during the hearing. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Board unanimously passed a motion recommending the City Commission annex the southerly .988 acres of Lot 18, Block 2, GF 15th Addition, subject to the following conditions being fulfilled by the applicant.
These conditions have been met by the applicant. Commissioner Hinz moved, seconded by Commissioner Jovick-Kuntz, that the City Commission adopt Resolution 9191.
Motion carried 4-0.
|
||||||||||||||
| Ord. 2808, Zoning for GF 15th Add, B2, L18 (portion). Set public hearing. | 5.
ORDINANCE 2808, ESTABLISH ZONING ON A PORTION OF LOT 18, BLOCK 2, GF 15TH ADDITION.
Staff Report 5 ] [ Ord. 2808 ]
If adopted, Ordinance 2808 would assign a zoning classification of "LB" Local Business, "C" Area District, to the southerly portion of Lot 18, Block 2, GF 15th Addition, upon annexation of same to the City. The property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of 9th Street South and 17th Avenue South. Commissioner Hinz moved, seconded by Commissioner Jovick-Kuntz, that the City Commission accept Ordinance 2808 on first reading and set a hearing for 7 pm, October 16, 2001, to consider adoption of Ordinance 2808.
Motion carried 4-0.
|
||||||||||||||
| Consent Agenda. Approved as printed. | CONSENT AGENDA6.
7.
Total Expenditures of $873,772 for the period of August 22 - September 1, 2001, to include claims over $500, in the amount of $710,010. [ Staff Report 7 ]
8.
Contracts list. [ Staff Report 8 ]
9.
Change in use of 2001/2002 CDBG funding of $45,450 granted to the Great Falls Transit District. [ Staff Report 9 ]
10.
Construction Agreement with Montana Power Company for relocating 10 poles as part of the 18th Avenue North and 52nd Street North Roadway Construction Project (OF 1299). [ Staff Report 10 ] [*]
11.
Final Payment to United Materials and the State Miscellaneous Tax Division in the amount of $10,437.50 for the 2001 Miscellaneous Street Repairs Project (OF 1333). [ Staff Report 11 ]
12.
Amended Plat dedicating a strip of park land as public right-of-way described a "Gallatin Park" in North Riverview Terrace Section 2, and Park in North Riverview Terrace, Section 3, Part 1, and the Findings of Fact. [ Staff Report 12 ] [*]
13.
Postpone bid award for the Waste Water Treatment Plant Solids Handling Project (1176.1) to allow staff additional time to analyze the bids. [ Staff Report 13 ]
Commissioner Rosenbaum moved, seconded by Commissioner Hinz, that the City Commission accept the Consent Agenda as printed.
Motion carried 4-0. |
||||||||||||||
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS |
|||||||||||||||
| Variance, GF Townsite B182, Lots 1 and 2. Approved. |
14A.
VARIANCE REQUEST, GF TOWNSITE, B182, WEST 10 FEET OF LOT 1 AND ALL OF LOT 2.
[ Staff Report 14A ]
Don Marble, owner of the property located at 900 6 Ave N, requested a variance to OCCGF 17.18.010 E. Based on the square footage of the lot (9017 square feet), a 1600 square foot garage would be allowed. The variance would allow the applicant to build a 2060 square foot garage and exceed the allowed garage area by 460 square feet. OCCGF 17.48.010 states that "the maximum size allowance for private garages is based on the total area of the property involved, e.g., a lot 7501 square feet to 10,000 square feet in size is allowed 1600 square feet of garage". The Board of Adjustment heard the request on August 27, 2001. Staff reviewed the application, the applicable sections of the code, and commented on the impact an oversized garage has on adjacent property owners. Staff also reported that the historical variance file showed several variances allowing reduced side and/or front setbacks, but no similar variances allowing garage area exceptions. Lot coverage/building bulk standards were not an issue, because the Area District allows forty-five percent of the lot area to be built on. With the oversized garage, the structures on the site would be approximately 400 square feet under the maximum lot coverage. Don Marble presented his application and stated that his deteriorating medical condition required that he be closer to his equipment and office. The large garage was to be used to park two vehicles and to store his wood working equipment. It will include a small office area for his business and will be built to match the appearance of his house. Don reviewed the long history of family ownership of the property, submitted several photographs of the neighborhood, and described the many commercial properties in the immediate area. He also provided two letters supporting the variance (a letter from his doctor and a letter from an adjacent neighbor), and an article describing government efforts aimed at fully integrating disabled people into their communities. Mr. John Borgreen (consultant for elderly and handicap services) spoke in favor of the variance. Mr. Borgreen wss familiar with the progressive deterioration of the illness and the effect it will have on Mr. Marble's ability to get around. Mr. Borgreen felt that the variance would be a reasonable accommodation considering Mr. Marble's condition. The Board then entered into discussion. Board comments focused on the fragile nature of therevitalization area, the fact that the allowed garage square footage (1600 square feet) would be sufficient, and the possibility that future owners of the property would assume that a commercial use of the lot was permitted. Following the discussion, there was a motion made and seconded to deny the variance, and the Board voted unanimously to recommend that the City Commission deny the variance application. The City Commission heard the variance request during their work session held immediately before the City Commission regular meeting. Mr. Marble repeated his arguments to the Commission and requested they overrule the Board of Adjustment's recommendation for denial. It was the consensus of the City Commission to place the variance request on the formal agenda in order to grant the request. Commissioner Jovick-Kuntz moved, seconded by Commissioner Rosenbaum, that the City Commission overrule the recommendation of the Board of Adjustment and grant the variance to OCCGF 17.48.010 to allow a 2000 square foot garage on property described as GF Townsite, Block 182, the west 10 feet of Lot 1 and all of Lot 2. Commissioner Hinz pointed out that Mr. Marble agreed to reduce the size of his garage to 2000 square feet during the work session.
Motion carried 4-0.
|
||||||||||||||
PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS |
|||||||||||||||
| Terrorist Attack | 18A.
Morgan Wolf, 1115 8th Avenue North, expressed that it is important that all people of the world respect and honor each other. His comments were in response to the terrorist bombings of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. |
||||||||||||||
| Terrorist Attack | 18B.
Mr. Bob Haddock, 1204 34th Street South, stated he was organizing a "Convoy of Concern" as a way for Great Falls residents to help those in need in New York and Washington DC.
Mayor Gray invited those who had comments regarding the Ambulance Proposal to address the Commission at this point. Note: The City Commission heard a proposal from Chief Hirose to purchase ambulances and begin to have the Fire Department transport patients to the hospital rather than just respond to all medical calls (as they do today). The following comments were made in a continuation of the discussion started during the work session.
|
||||||||||||||
| Ambulance Purchase | 18C.
Morgan Wolf, 1115 8th Avenue North, asked if there had been any indication since Big Sky Ambulance closed its doors, that the response time from the other ambulance companies increased. Great Falls Fire/Rescue Chief Hirose stated that two weeks ago an ambulance was requested to a scene by Great Falls Fire/Rescue and they were told an ambulance was not available. Mr. Wolf asked what the projected response time would be if an ambulance responded from two of the four fire stations. Great Falls Fire/Rescue Chief Hirose stated that the ambulance response time would depend on where the incident was located. He suggested it may increase until all four Fire Stations had ambulance units. |
||||||||||||||
18D.
Frank Vandersloot, President/CEO, of Melaleuca, a company that owns one of the ambulance companies, provided information about the company itself and information about him personally. He stated that he invested $1.2 million to bring ambulance companies into Great Falls and that he planned to operate those companies in Great Falls for many years to come. He stated that several cities either the same size of Great Falls or larger, operated with only one ambulance company owned by the City in which the tax payers had to subsidize the ambulance operation significantly. He encouraged the City Commission investigate other cities operating ambulance companies and ask them to provide budgets and other financial data that may assist them in making a decision. He added that if the City was not satisfied with the ambulance service provided by his company, he had the financial resources to address those issues and that he would resolve issues when they were brought to him. He explained that he owned one of the two ambulance companies, and had a financial interest in the other ambulance company. He said that with only two companies in Great Falls he wanted to reinvest into the community. He added that if the Great Falls Fire Rescue operated a competing ambulance service, then he would be forced into a "nip and tuck" position again such as he was when Big Sky Ambulance was in business. He asked that the City Commission give his companies a chance to provide an excellent service to Great Falls. He offered that if the City did not feel that the ambulance service provided was not satisfactory to let him know what the issues were and to give him an opportunity to make adjustments. He asked that the City Commission look into history and find a successful case where a city got into the ambulance business with two competing ambulance companies and made it a profitable venture. |
|||||||||||||||
18E.
John Ungaretti, Montana Healthcare Consultants, Inc., asked if the billing service for the ambulance would be bid out. Great Falls Fire/Rescue Chief Hirose stated that nothing had been finalized but that bidding that service was a possibility.
|
|||||||||||||||
18F.
Jennifer Johnston, 2723 4 Avenue North, stated she works for Great Falls Ambulance and Community Service Ambulance. She expressed concern about the coverage at Fire Station 3 if the Fire Department began operating an ambulance company out of that station. She explained that she understood Chief Hirose to say that if a call came in and it was deemed necessary for the Fire crew to respond in the ambulance, then they would take that unit. If a fire call came in while the crew was out on an ambulance call then another engine company would have to respond which would increase the response time. She added that, on the average, each medical call that requires transport averaged one hour which meant that the fire crew would be unavailable to assist in the event of a fire until they cleared from the medical call. Chief Hirose disagreed. He stated that currently Great Falls Fire/Rescue responds to all medical emergency calls. He added that the Fire Department was only adding transport. Ms. Johnston rebutted stating that adding patient transport was different because the Fire crew could not be called away from that responsibility until they cleared from the hospital. She asked the City Commission to carefully consider this prior to making a decision. |
|||||||||||||||
18G.
Morgan Wolf, 1115 8th Avenue North, stated he was uncertain about the status of the 911 Dispatch fees. Chief Jones stated that Staff was in the process of analyzing the formula used when calculating the fees. He added that two of the ambulance companies were current to December 31, 2000. The other two (including Mercy Flight) were not paid up to December 31, 2000. He added that until everyone was at the same payment level, and until the formula was re-analyzed, Staff would not bill the ambulance companies. Mr. Wolf asked how dispatch was going to distinguish the difference between Great Falls Ambulance Service and the City of Great Falls Ambulance Service. Chief Hirose stated that would be worked out. Mr. Wolf also suggested that the City Commission not hold a public hearing on this issue since there was no community support for the City to begin ambulance transport services. |
|||||||||||||||
18H.
Dean Stockton, Sr., suggested that the City Commission shouldn't fix anything that wasn't broken. He added that he doesn't want ambulance service to be tax supported. He asked why the City would consider purchasing the assets of a company that went broke. He added that he understood that at the next City Commission meeting the Commission would be asked to buy equipment that was already being used by the Fire Department. Chief Hirose responded that the Big Sky Ambulance equipment was either locked up in their facility or was being stored at the Fire Training Center. He explained that the City allowed Big Sky Ambulance to store one of the ambulances at the Fire Training Center because they did not have room to store it at their facility. He also explained that the Great Falls Fire/Rescue was not using any of the equipment previously owned by Big Sky Ambulance. |
|||||||||||||||
18I.
Jeremy Birts, 1719 5th Avenue North, Great Falls Police Officer, asked if the purchase of the ambulances would take away funds used in other departments. Cheryl Patton, Assistant City Manager, stated that the proposal was designed to free up the General Fund. She stated that if Great Falls Fire/Rescue had a revenue source, such as that which would come from ambulance transport, then they could reduce their reliance on the General Fund.
|
|||||||||||||||
18J.
Lee Rauth, 3236 Arbor Way, stated he works for Benefis Healthcare and while he was not representing that entity, he explained that if the City started an ambulance company, it would have trickling affects on the hospital. He clarified that Benefis had a contract with Great Falls Ambulance Service to provide transport services between hospital campuses and that the ambulance company provided that service for a very low dollar amount. Mr. Rauth stated that if the City competed against that ambulance company, then that company may have to raise their rates to cover their costs - thus affecting the contract with Benefis. |
|||||||||||||||
18K.
Mr. Vandersloot, asked why did the City respond to all medical calls of the private ambulance companies, but they wouldn't do that for their own calls. In other words, when Fire Station 3 crew responded to a medical call, he suspected that the crew from Fire Station 1 would not respond also. But, when a private ambulance company was called to a scene, the Fire Department also dispatched a unit. Mr. Vandersloot also asked what would happen to insurance rates if the fire response time increased. Mr. Vandersloot offered to sell the City ambulances that were in better shape than the ones offered by Big Sky for probably less than we would be paying Big Sky for them. Finally, Mr. Vandersloot asked about ambulance service to community events. He stated that his company often provides stand-by service for the State Fair, 4th of July and sporting events for free. He asked if the City ambulance would also do that. Commissioner Hinz asked why Mr. Vandersloot would provide a service to Benefis Healthcare at cost. Mr. Vandersloot stated that every dollar of revenue was important especially in a market that was highly competitive. |
|||||||||||||||
18L.
Jeff Jackson, Fire Firefighter, asked if Mr. Vandersloot's company would offer the same rate to Benefis Healthcare on a long-term basis. Mr. Vandersloot stated that he was committed to staying in Great Falls for a long period of time. He asked the Commission to find a city that offered ambulance service that made a profit.
There being no one further to address the City Commission, Mayor Gray asked that staff find out what other communities were doing; explain in detail what the fire fighter staff assignments would be; inquire of other communities offering ambulance service if they subsidized that service with tax dollars; and to find out if insurance rates would increase. Commissioner Hinz asked for information pertaining to the call volume at each of the Fire Stations. Assistant City Manager Cheryl Patton stated that Staff brought this proposal to the Commission for three reasons. 1) Competition was healthy and if the City competed with the private ambulance companies it could ensure a higher quality of service at lower rates. Ms. Patton reminded the Commission that the City competes in the sanitation business and it works out quite well. 2) There was genuine concern that the community have quality ambulance service - she added that past events suggested otherwise. And 3) This proposal could reduce General Fund support for Great Falls Fire/Rescue, freeing up funds for other services such a police and parks. Commissioner Jovick-Kuntz stated she was uncomfortable with Staff coming back in two-weeks asking the Commission to make a decision. She stated she was interested in Staff providing responses to the questions asked tonight and to report back to the Commission. Commissioners Hinz and Rosenbaum concurred. Mayor Gray also concurred and stated that he would like Staff to do a due-diligence on running an ambulance service. Mr. Stockton, Sr. added that Staff should not compare sanitation service to the ambulance business because the customer base was more stable for sanitation service. |
|||||||||||||||
ADJOURNMENT |
|||||||||||||||
| Adjourn | There being no further business to come before the Commission, the regular meeting of September 18, 2001, adjourned at 8:58 p.m. |
/S/
Randall H. Gray, Mayor
/S/
Peggy J. Bourne, City Clerk
* Non-text and electronically unavailable attachments are on file in the City Clerk's Office
Home => Records =>
Commission Minutes Listing Page => 2001 Commission Minutes